ziscus vs giscus, Disqus, Isso, Remark42

How ziscus compares to other comment systems for static sites.

Feature comparison

ziscus giscus Disqus Isso Remark42
Client JavaScript None iframe + JS Heavy JS ~8 KB JS ~40 KB JS
Account required No GitHub Disqus / social No Optional
Data ownership Your D1 database GitHub Discussions Disqus servers Your SQLite file Your server
Hosting Cloudflare (edge) GitHub Disqus SaaS Self-hosted server Self-hosted server
AI spam filtering Workers AI (free tier) No Yes (proprietary) Akismet (paid) Basic filters
Cost Free (Cloudflare free tier) Free Free with ads / $12/mo Free (+ server cost) Free (+ server cost)
Server required No (serverless) No No Yes (Python) Yes (Go/Docker)
Tracking / ads None None Yes (free tier) None None
Moderation CLI Yes (approve/reject/spam/ban) GitHub UI Disqus dashboard Admin panel Admin UI
Instant feedback HTMLRewriter (no JS) Client JS Client JS Client JS Client JS
SSG support Hugo, Astro, Eleventy, Jekyll, Next.js Any (JS embed) Any (JS embed) Any (JS embed) Any (JS embed)
Setup time ~3 minutes (npx ziscus deploy) ~5 minutes ~2 minutes ~30 minutes ~30 minutes

Why ziscus?

If you care about: zero JavaScript on your pages, anonymous commenting without accounts, owning your data, and not running a server, ziscus is the only option that checks all four boxes.

giscus is closest but requires GitHub accounts and loads JavaScript. Isso and Remark42 are great self-hosted options but need a running server. Disqus is easy but tracks your visitors and serves ads.

Back to ziscus.com | Source on GitHub

Comments

No comments yet — be the first to comment.